Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
703-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

703-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013106 50.867463)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013064 50.867459,-1.013066 50.867467,-1.013072 50.867475,-1.013081 50.867481,-1.013093 50.867485,-1.013106 50.867486,-1.013119 50.867485,-1.013131 50.867481,-1.013140 50.867475,-1.013147 50.867468,-1.013149 50.867460,-1.013147 50.867451,-1.013141 50.867444,-1.013132 50.867438,-1.013120 50.867434,-1.013107 50.867432,-1.013094 50.867433,-1.013082 50.867437,-1.013072 50.867443,-1.013066 50.867451,-1.013064 50.867459)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL